Bolen Letters
— Editorial Standards

Observing the Practice of Considered Nutrition Writing

Bolen Letters operates under the following editorial principles: articles are reviewed by at least one second editor before publication, sources are cited where appropriate, corrections are noted publicly, and writers disclose any commercial relationships that could influence their selection of subject matter.

Content published by Bolen Letters is selected based on published nutritional research and reviewed for editorial accuracy by a second editor before publication.

01
Independence

Editorial decisions are made independently of commercial interest. No advertiser influences article selection or framing.

02
Accuracy

Factual claims are verified against published nutritional literature. Where evidence is limited, that limitation is stated plainly in the text.

03
Transparency

All writers identify commercial relationships relevant to their subjects. Corrections are published within the original article and dated.

04
Restraint

The publication does not make claims beyond what the available evidence supports. Speculation is labelled as such.

Review Process

From Draft to Published Record

Each piece moves through a defined sequence before it reaches readers. The process is the same for commissioned work and unsolicited contributions.

01
Submission

The writer submits a draft with a note on the primary source materials consulted. Any commercial relationships relevant to the subject are declared at this stage.

02
Source Verification

A second editor checks factual claims against the cited sources. Where peer-reviewed literature is cited, the reference is confirmed. Claims without adequate support are flagged for revision or removal.

03
Editorial Review

The desk editor assesses tone, clarity, and editorial fit. Pieces that use unsupported superlatives, commercial-sounding language, or overstate the role of specific foods are returned for revision.

04
Accuracy Sign-Off

Before publication, both the writer and second editor confirm the final version is accurate to the best of their knowledge. Any areas of genuine uncertainty are noted within the article body.

05
Publication & Correction

Pieces are published with a date stamp. If a correction becomes necessary after publication, it is appended to the article with the date of correction noted. The original text is not silently altered.

Source Standards
Preferred Sources
  • Peer-reviewed nutritional science journals
  • Published dietary research from independent academic institutions
  • Government and public health nutritional guidelines
  • Qualified nutrition professionals speaking on record
  • Longitudinal population food studies
Acceptable with Caveats
  • Observational studies (noted as such)
  • Registered dietitian commentary
  • Nutritional data from government food composition tables
  • Established food science textbooks
  • Systematic reviews where primary data is referenced
Not Acceptable
  • Manufacturer or supplier nutritional claims without independent corroboration
  • Anecdotal social media content as primary evidence
  • Unverified studies cited secondhand
  • Marketing copy from supplement or food companies
  • Retracted or corrected studies used without noting the retraction
Accuracy Policy

What Happens When Something Is Wrong

Errors are an inevitable part of editorial practice. What matters is how they are handled. Bolen Letters does not silently correct published articles. Every change made to a piece after publication is documented.

Readers who believe an article contains an inaccuracy are encouraged to write to [email protected]. Each report is reviewed by the second editor responsible for the original piece. If a correction is warranted, it is appended with the date and a brief note on what was changed.

Minor Correction

Spelling, grammar, or typographic errors are corrected without a formal note unless the error affected meaning.

Factual Correction

Corrections to factual claims — including nutritional figures, sourced statements, or named individuals — are appended to the article with a correction note and date.

Substantive Revision

If an article requires significant revision after publication — for example, because a cited study has since been re-evaluated — the revision is noted prominently at the top of the article with a full explanation.

Retraction

In rare cases where an article cannot be corrected sufficiently, it is retracted. The original title remains visible with a note explaining the retraction and the reason for it.

Publication Classification

Bolen Letters is an independent editorial publication focused on everyday nutrition practices and weight awareness. The publication is not affiliated with any commercial, governmental, or institutional body.

Articles published on Bolen Letters are editorial in nature and reflect the writers' observations on everyday nutrition practices and weight awareness. The content is not intended as professional advice, nor as guidance for the management of any specific condition. Readers with specific concerns about their daily routines are encouraged to speak with a qualified wellness professional.
Standards Questions